Which theory allows for the use of an intermediate weapon to control varying levels of resistance?

The Total Control Theory is recognized for its structured approach to managing different levels of threat and resistance in a confrontational situation. This theory provides a framework that allows law enforcement and security personnel to assess the level of resistance encountered and respond appropriately with an intermediate weapon, such as a taser or baton, instead of using lethal force.

By adhering to Total Control Theory, officers can dynamically adjust their response strategies based on the behavior and actions of the individual they are confronting. This tiered response system is crucial for maintaining control while minimizing the risk of excessive force, enabling officers to effectively manage an encounter without escalating the situation unnecessarily.

The other theories mentioned, while they may address aspects of self-defense or responses to resistance, do not specifically outline a system that incorporates an intermediate weapon in a systematic way tailored to varying levels of resistance. Total Control Theory stands out for its emphasis on proportionality and graduated responses, which is essential in law enforcement practice.